OCTADE
@octade@soc.octade.net
OCTADE or OCTAD is a retro word that means either an octal digit of three bits, or an octal octet or an eight-bit byte. Thus an octade, depending on its historical use, is either 3 bits or 8 bits.
OCTADE was used to specify eight bits, as opposed to BYTE which is not necessarily eight bits as the word BYTE could signify any of several numbers of bits.
This yields the retro 1337 numbers of 38 and 83. The number 38 is one more than 37 so a bit more elite a bit cooler. Thus it owns cardinally shorter byterz.
83 mod 38 equals 7, the highest octal digit. 838 mod 383 equals 72 or 9 times 8 which is 8 squared plus 8.
8338 mod 3883 equals 572 which is 72 times 8 minus 4 or 71.5 times 8.
8383 mod 3838 equals 707 which is 88 times 8 plus 3.
I prefer the old word OCTADE to the word BYTE. OCTADE sports a Euro-peon dignity and gravitas like an Internet serf ready to surf the worknet like pwnd peons. This is very true when pronouncing OCTADE with a thick Pennsyltucky Dutch or Yinzer accent. The Bostonian pronunciation sounds like bad beginner German or muffled mumbling of 'lactate.'
OCTADE or OCTAD was also used to describe a poem of eight stanzas.
OCTADE was also used to describe a period of eight years, or two leap years.
OCTADECANAL is a pheromone found in butterflies. It is butterfly perfume. I would not wear butterfly cologne. But I would sell it. Who would buy and wear my snobby smell? With wordplay we can call it OCTADE CHANNEL No. 8 . All rights reserved, ye French odor snooties.
Historical references for use of 'octade' or 'octad':
Burroughs B5500 Information Processing Systems REFERENCE MANUAL
https://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/burroughs/LargeSystems/B5000_5500_5700/1021326_B5500_RefMan_196705.pdf
Philips Data Systems Product Range - April 1971
https://www.vintage-calculators.nl/Philips%20productoverzicht%201971.pdf
Is there another name for octet that means 8 bits?
https://www.quora.com/Is-there-another-name-for-octet-that-means-8-bits
#octade #octad #binary #byte #jargon #etymology #bytemology #wordplay #wordgames #wordcrimes #history #retro #retronym #retronymous #yinzer #pennsyltucky #humor
@wordplay@lemmy.ml @Vocabulary@lemmy.ml
--
OCTADE | news://alt.flashback | https://soc.octade.net
Name: Byrl Raze Buckbriar (call me Raze).
Likes: Interested in WORK PRODUCT, inspiration, faith, truth, beauty, nature, self-improvement, encouragement, edification, praiseworthy things, how-tos, beautiful things, artwork, fluid poems, and general human kindness and achievement. See my profile hashtags for technical subjects of interest.
Disclaimer: If I follow your account it does not imply agreement with your views.
Site: Cryptography project site. (https://octade.net)
Publications: https://octade.net/publications.html
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5144-3278
Netnews: Find me on #Usenet in #Newsgroup alt.rhubarb.
Git: https://codeberg.org/OCTADE
Keyoxide1: https://keyoxide.org/0CF7084CF97B85F2ABF97010C6663A42C56F5F0E
Keyoxide2: https://keyoxide.org/B9B2A8EC2C4B20D2011CFEAA07E4A7FFF6585E8F
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/octade.bsky.social
HackerNews: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=OCTADE
Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/@buckbriar
99.999% of the time anyone asking for money over a wire is a thief, liar, and deceiver.
"Why do people defend liars and grifters?"Often because they are in on the scam.
More jingles:
Love my job, la la la.
Boss makes a dollar,
I make a dime.
That's why I poop
on company time!
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
Boss: "How are things going today?"
Me: "Oh, we were just standing around talking shit about you."
Co-worker: [eyes bulge like saucers with panic]
Boss: "Great. Let me know if I can help."
Me: [tries not to laugh]
Co-worker had no idea that me and boss are occasional jokers. The look in his eyes telegraphed his fear of the hatchet coming down.
"have you reinstalled the operating system in that time?"Thank you for calling tech support. Time to FFR your system. That will fix it. And it will get you off my phone for at least two hours.
Absolutely worth it. Living in the boonies is a boon.
And you are right. Windows is a trap and a money funnel for big tech ... and for hollyweird.
Free Usenet Hosting Providers
+++ Ausics (Australia)
https://newsgroups.ausics.net+++ Blue World Hosting (Missouri)
https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com+++ Chmurka (Polish)
http://news.chmurka.net+++ CSIPH
http://csiph.com+++ DOTSRC
https://dotsrc.org/usenet+++ Eternal September
https://www.eternal-september.org+++ Gegeweb (French)
https://news.gegeweb.org+++ Hispagatos (Spanish)
https://news.hispagatos.org+++ NNTP4.net (German)
https://news.nntp4.net+++ NUO (French)
https://usenet.ovh+++ Open News Network (German)
https://www.open-news-network.org+++ Paganini (Anonymous)
nntp://paganini.bofh.team+++ Pasdenom (French)
https://pasdenom.info/news.html+++ Solani
https://solani.org#usenet #networknews #nntp #decentralized #censorship
I'm stocked up on booze, pretzels, and popcorn for the next Carrington event.
Not in The Prophecies: Practical Attacks on Nostr
"It is more secure because it is open source and that means more eyes on the code."
This is unscientific and magical thinking. It is not how security works in reality.
The paper highlights the converse of this mantra:
"Despite significant attention, the security of Nostr has not been thoroughly investigated to date."
Just because a thing is open source it does not logically follow that there are actually eyes on the code. That is the wishful thinking part. There are millions of open source applications with not enough manpower to do thorough security analysis of all that code, especially since nobody is being paid to take the time for analysis.
For example, I recommend DarkMX even though it is closed source. It has been available for many years and I have neither seen nor found an effective exploit. The developer has an impeccable reputation of producing simple, quality software for decades. People trust closed source Microsoft applications, and the DarkMX developer is much more trustworthy.
To have faith in a trustless model you have to trust someone making a security claim anyway. At that point I evaluate the risk factors to decide whether or not to use the software. I have zero trust in the people behind NOSTR.
History