Socialist 4Chan?

“There’s no core ideology other than aggrieved #men who watch a lot of #pornography and think that’s how their lives should be,” Arntfield said. “This individual seems to be taking it in a new direction, where he’s introducing biological arguments as to why this all needs to be course corrected, and then ultimately it ends with a call to #massviolence.”

The document also details what the #gunman viewed as specific targets that, in his estimation, were deserving of dire consequences, including major #realestate brokerages, #privateequity firms, supporters of #Zionism, health insurance #CEOs, pick up artists, plastic #surgeons and those profiting from mass #immigration.

Underpinning the entire #manifesto was an #anticapitalist sentiment, recurrent reference to hypergamy – coupling up with someone of higher status – and a belief that society is structured in a way that results in #inequality for #whitemen[...]"

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/montreal-shooter-left-behind-manifesto-containing-violent-rhetoric-directed-at-women-police-others/

Report: "Israel is Spying On Millions Of Christian Americans In Their Churches"

"Amid a massive drop in support from the Christian community, Israel is spending $Ms to target individuals entering churches or Christian colleges with ads"...

... & "paying pastors across the country to promote propaganda & false 'anti-Palestinian' narratives every Sunday."

https://israelpalestinenews.org/fara-docs-israel-is-spying-on-millions-of-christian-americans-in-their-churches/

#USPol #EUPol #IsraeliSpying #Zionism #news #palestine #USChristianChurches .

Israel is a curse on humanity.

#iran #lebanon #zionism

Alt...

headline - israel strikes beirut

Iran has been using trained psychologists to tune their messaging to Trump.

Because they know they're dealign with a neuro-atypical person.

link should jump to 8m25s
https://youtu.be/Nnb6iOubt14?t=505

#trump #iran #uspol #zionism

SINS of Christian Nationalism & Zionism

Sins of Christian War-Making

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-maDeoEDiI

Synopsis:

Holy war is a doctrine of the devil. Every church and organization promoting war for Christ is anti-christ.

Man cannot solve the evil in the world by 'fighting' or violence. That is exactly what the devil and his minions want. The gospel can not be spread by the sword or power of the state.

Every form of radical liberation theology or dominion theology is satanic because it denies the word of God and replaces it with the gospel of war.

Christian nationalists hate the lost because they too are lost souls with a messiah complex. Instead of following the messiah they want to reconstruct him in the imperial state. They do not have love of their neighbor.

My observation:

Christian Nationalism is disguised Roman imperialism, globalism and Zionism, hence it is neither Christian nor nationalist in character. Christian Nationalism has the same character imprint as Holy Roman Empire crusaderism. It is wicked and deceitful.

Christian Nationalists claim to advance 'dominion' or 'taking dominion'. This is blasphemy. The dominion over the nations was given to Jesus, not to imperfect men. Jesus is the one who is given dominion over all the nations. Thus Christian Nationalism blasphemously posits itself as the messiah with the dominion, just like its Catholic parent church.

#GunpointGospel #Crusades #HolyWar #Catholic #HolyWar #Christian #ChristianNationalism #Nationalism #Zionism #Christianity #DominionTheology #Church

--

OCTADE | news://alt.crossover | https://soc.octade.net

On why and when Hitler was admired within the Zionist right

The Zionist Revisionist movement, known for its advocacy of forceful action to achieve its goals (i.e., colonizing Palestine at any cost preferably with Britain as an ally), has, at times, been susceptible to the perceived 'strength and decisiveness' of the Nazi regime. The Nazis’ willingness to use force to achieve their objectives resonated with some. But to what extent?

Historian Amir Goldstein explores the significant (though ultimately contained,) attraction of a "maximalist faction" within the Revisionist movement to fascism and, to a degree, Nazism, which was largely spearheaded by the influential figure of Abba Ahimeir.

Emerging in the late 1920s, this faction grew out of a core group of individuals who had previously been involved in the labor movement and became disillusioned with its perceived shortcomings. Unlike the more "moderate" Revisionists, they rejected the idea of the movement as merely an opposition party to mainstream political leadership within the Zionist movement, and strongly supported Vladimir Jabotinsky’s drive to separate from the Zionist organization. However, they sharply diverged from Jabotinsky’s vision in crucial ways

Central to this faction was Abba Ahimeir, who expressed deep dissatisfaction with democracy, viewing it as a "parliamentary patter," "spoiled liberalism," and "coddling" – terms he used to dismiss what he saw as the ineffectiveness of democratic principles. He actively sought a more forceful and centralized model of leadership, drawn to the perceived power and effectiveness of fascism. The rise of fascism in Europe had a profound appeal to Ahimeir and his circle. They admired how fascist movements could generate momentum, mobilize mass support, seize political institutions, and establish authoritarian regimes that effectively dismantled opposing political forces.

Ahimeir became a key advocate for this shift within the Revisionist movement. He openly embraced a "national dictatorship" as a path to achieving a Jewish state and frequently invoked the leadership styles of figures like Mussolini as examples to emulate. He even referred to Jabotinsky as "the Duce" and actively sought to build paramilitary forces within the movement, modeled on fascist organizations. This involved encouraging a culture of forceful action and openly rejecting the emphasis on democratic values championed by Jabotinsky.

While the maximalist faction, with Ahimeir at its core, briefly gained influence, Jabotinsky’s strong opposition ultimately prevented the movement from fully embracing fascist ideals. The assassination of Chaim Arlozorov further complicated the situation, with rumors and accusations linking Revisionist extremists to the act, damaging the movement's reputation.

[...] At this stage, the Nazi anti-semitism was not perceived by the radical right circles as sufficient reason to condemn Nazism as a phenomenon in its entirety. In the movement’s newspaper, Hazit HaAm, (חזית העם) the writings of maximalist lawyer Zvi Eliyahu Cohen appeared, among others: ‘Had Hitler not been anti-Semitic, we would not have opposed his ideology. Hitler saved Germany.’ In another article, just weeks after Hitler’s rise to power, it was written there: ‘The socialists and democrats of all stripes believe that the Hitler movement is merely a shell. And we believe there is both a shell and a core. The anti-Semitic shell must be discarded, but not the anti-Marxist core within.’"

Although the flirtation with fascism remained a contained phenomenon, the story of Abba Ahimeir and his circle reveals an undercurrent within early Zionist thought, more relevant than ever today.

Hebrew https://www.haaretz.co.il/magazine/the-edge/2025-05-08/ty-article/.highlight/00000196-af2c-d9bf-a1b6-efacf11a0000 or https://archive.is/jrnQy

Amir Goldstein is a historian from Tel Hai College (an institution under development). The article is based, among other things, on the research of pioneers in the study of Zionist revisionism: Joseph Heller, Yitzhak Weitz, Aryeh Naor, Eran Kaplan, Jacob Shavit, and Colin Schindler.

@histodons
@palestine
@israel
#Zionism #Fascism #Nazism #antiesmitism #marxism