soc.octade.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
social@octade.net

Search results for tag #scotus

[?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
@wistquotes@friendica.world

A quotation from Felix Frankfurter

The preservation of the community from divisive conflicts, of Government from irreconcilable pressures by religious groups, of religion from censorship and coercion, however subtly exercised, requires strict confinement of the State to instruction other than religious, leaving to the individual’s church and home indoctrination in the faith of his choice.

Felix Frankfurter (1882–1965) American jurist, teacher; US Supreme Court Justice (1939–62)
McCollum v. Board of Education 333 U.S. 217 (1948)
[concurring]


More about this quote: wist.info/frankfurter-felix/85…

    [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
    @wistquotes@friendica.world

    A quotation from Abe Fortas

    Under our Constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. Freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots.

    Abraham Fortas (1910–1982) American academic, jurist, lawyer; US Supreme Court Justice (1965–69)
    Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969) [majority opinion]


    More about this quote: wist.info/fortas-abe/86206/

      [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
      @wistquotes@friendica.world

      A quotation from Felix Frankfurter

      The nonsectarian or secular public school was the means of reconciling freedom in general with religious freedom. The sharp confinement of the public schools to secular education was a recognition of the need of a democratic society to educate its children, insofar as the State undertook to do so, in an atmosphere free from pressures in a realm in which pressures are most resisted and where conflicts are most easily and most bitterly engendered. Designed to serve as perhaps the most powerful agency for promoting cohesion among a heterogeneous democratic people, the public school must keep scrupulously free from entanglement in the strife of sects.

      Felix Frankfurter (1882–1965) American jurist, teacher; US Supreme Court Justice (1939–62)
      McCollum v. Board of Education 333 U.S. 216–217 (1948)
      [concurring]


      More about this quote: wist.info/frankfurter-felix/85…

        Light boosted

        [?]ProPublica » 🌐
        @ProPublica@newsie.social

        [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
        @wistquotes@friendica.world

        A quotation from Felix Frankfurter

        The history of liberty is the history of the observances of procedural safeguards.

        Felix Frankfurter (1882–1965) American jurist, teacher; US Supreme Court Justice (1939–62)
        McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 347 (1943) [majority opinion]


        More about this quote: wist.info/frankfurter-felix/14…

          [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
          @wistquotes@friendica.world

          A quotation from Felix Frankfurter

          If nowhere else, in the relation between Church and State, “good fences make good neighbors.”

          Felix Frankfurter (1882–1965) American jurist, teacher; US Supreme Court Justice (1939–62)
          McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 232 (1948)
          [concurring]


          More about this quote: wist.info/frankfurter-felix/11…

            [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
            @wistquotes@friendica.world

            A quotation from Abraham Fortas

            Any departure from absolute regimentation may cause trouble. Any variation from the majority’s opinion may inspire fear. Any word spoken, in class, in the lunchroom, or on the campus, that deviates from the view of another person may start an argument or cause a disturbance. But our Constitution says we must take this risk, and our history says that it is this sort of hazardous freedom — this kind of openness — that is the basis of our national strength and of the independence and vigor of Americans who grow up and live in this relatively permissive, often disputatious, society.

            Abraham Fortas (1910–1982) American academic, jurist, lawyer; US Supreme Court Justice (1965–69)
            Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, 508 (1969) [majority opinion]


            More about this quote: wist.info/fortas-abe/13226/

              [?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
              @wistquotes@friendica.world

              A quotation from Hugo Black

              In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.

              Hugo Black (1886–1971) American politician and jurist, US Supreme Court Justice (1937–71)
              New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713, 717 (1971) (concurring)


              More about this quote: wist.info/black-hugo/36400/

              The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. - Hugo Black

              Alt...The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. - Hugo Black

                [?]Philosophics » 🌐
                @microglyphics@mastodon.social

                « We repeat today what we have held before: An officer may enter a home without a warrant if he has “an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury.” »

                What's wrong with this statement – and I don't mean the morality of it.

                brywillis634737.substack.com/p

                  [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                  @Nonilex@masto.ai

                  More than a dozen families of multiple faiths sued to block the after it was signed by Gov (R) last year. They argued the statute violates the ban on the government establishing , known as the , & improperly forced the faith onto students.

                  The families are being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, & Americans United, a group that advocates for the .

                    [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                    @Nonilex@masto.ai

                    The case would be one of the most significant dealing with in since an ideologically divided ruled in 2022 that a former public high school football coach’s on-field prayers were protected under the ’s right to .
                    In the current case, the [ultra-conservative] US Court of Appeals for the in New Orleans upheld the on a 9-8 vote, overturning a lower-court ruling that found the measure .

                      [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                      @Nonilex@masto.ai

                      The justices are expected to decide in coming months whether to take up the case, which is being closely watched as conservatives…work to expand “rights” [ ] in public spaces & opponents battle them in court. In April, a conservative appeals court upheld the law in a narrowly divided opinion.

                        muddle 🥣 boosted

                        [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                        @Nonilex@masto.ai

                        Be afraid. Be very afraid.

                        asked to hear case on requiring in

                        
The case could set up a landmark clash over the .

                        With this , I truly fear the outcome.


                        wapo.st/4xaYNcK

                          [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                          @Nonilex@masto.ai

                          groups Monday asked to hear their challenge of a requiring that all ’ classrooms display the , potentially setting up a landmark clash over the .

                            JJDavis :terminal: boosted

                            [?]Anna Haunthro » 🌐
                            @AnnaAnthro@mastodon.social

                            justice Alito took undisclosed luxury fishing trip to with Billionaire Paul Singer before Singer’s cases came before the Court

                            propublica.org/article/samuel-

                              [?]CCIA » 🌐
                              @CCIAnet@techpolicy.social

                              CCIA’s Director of the Litigation Center Burke Kappler examines a recent Supreme Court ruling that expands our rights in the digital age. ’ ruling in Chatrie v. United States is a significant win for digital privacy, reaffirming that handing information to a tech company for one purpose does not mean handing it to the government for another. ccianet.org/articles/the-supre

                                [?]Indigo Privacy » 🌐
                                @indigoprivacy@mastodon.social

                                The Supreme Court is letting Texas enforce its App Store Accountability Act. Under-18s need a parent's OK to download any app. To spot minors, though, Apple and Google must age-verify everyone. Like carding every customer at the bookstore door, a judge said.

                                  [?]Kent Pitman » 🌐
                                  @kentpitman@climatejustice.social

                                  Today, in lieu of scheduled celebrations of a US that is held hostage by forces bent on dismantling democracy, I am re-posting an essay I wrote in September 2024, prior to the last election, about the considerable repair work that American democracy needs to protect itself from tyrants.

                                  netsettlement.blogspot.com/202

                                    muddle 🥣 boosted

                                    [?]Trump & Epstein: Biz partners. » 🌐
                                    @MugsysRapSheet@mastodon.social

                                    DAMN STRAIGHT! 👍

                                    leftylady.bsky.social wrote:

Clarence Thomas says the 14th Amendment should be read narrowly because it was written for formerly enslaved people.

By that logic, the 2nd Amendment was written for muskets, not AR-15s. Funny how that kind of originalism only shows up when it's convenient.

                                    Alt...leftylady.bsky.social wrote: Clarence Thomas says the 14th Amendment should be read narrowly because it was written for formerly enslaved people. By that logic, the 2nd Amendment was written for muskets, not AR-15s. Funny how that kind of originalism only shows up when it's convenient.

                                      [?]Mark Wyner Won’t Comply :vm: » 🌐
                                      @markwyner@mas.to

                                      This is a privacy victory. It deserves to be celebrated. The Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment, 6–3.

                                      scotusblog.com/2026/06/court-r

                                      However, there’s a hidden detail that is worth flagging. And it’s not good.

                                      This ruling arose from Chatrie v United States. Google gave generic cell phone records to the cops. No specificity means unconstitutional. Maybe.

                                      The federal judge on the case agreed that it was unconstitutional. But she allowed evidence from the violation to be used anyway. Why? She cited that “even if there had been a violation of the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officials had acted in good faith.”

                                      In. Good. Faith.

                                      This translates to “cops can violate the constitution if we believe their intentions are good.”

                                      How many cops do you know who act in good faith?

                                        MDMRN boosted

                                        [?]Space Queen Enthusiast » 🌐
                                        @GalacticGoddess@ieji.de

                                        >SCOTUS upholds transgender sports bans

                                        All I can say is this: The transgender community deserves so much better then this. I'm sorry that the world is failing you. You deserve to not only survive, but thrive. I hope the world will reflect that one day.

                                          muddle 🥣 boosted

                                          [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                          @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                          YES!!!!!!

                                          🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
                                          Monday declined to take up an appeal from over a $5 million verdict & finding that he sexually abused & defamed , a decision that means Trump will now HAVE TO PAY the magazine columnist.
                                          🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

                                          cnn.com/2026/06/29/politics/e-

                                            muddle 🥣 boosted

                                            [?]Peter Gleick » 🌐
                                            @petergleick@fediscience.org

                                            It isn't just democracy, voting rights, civil rights and and the Constitution that this Supreme Court is destroying. It's also .

                                            pbs.org/newshour/show/what-sci

                                              [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                              @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                              struckdown a requiring people to get permission to carry into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing rights.

                                              The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.

                                              It’s a win for the admin, which argued the law violates the . It’s also a win for planners.

                                              apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

                                                oheso boosted

                                                [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                                @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                                I guess it’s only protected if it’s *their* .

                                                rules man can’t sue Louisiana prison officials who cut his dreadlocks.


                                                apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

                                                  1 ★ 0 ↺

                                                  [?]OCTADE » 🌐
                                                  @octade@soc.octade.net

                                                  We interrupt your regularly scheduled fearmongering to bring you this important message:

                                                  SCOTUS rules that ordinary Americans do NOT owe income tax!

                                                  https://youtu.be/bTLYcr-JuDc

                                                  SCOTUS just contradicted a century of circuit courts and their malicious rulings subjecting Americans to the income tax. Will anyone notice?

                                                  [copypasta]

                                                  Dr Champion shows you the astounding words of a recent US Supreme Court decision, in which the Court explains why Americans need not pay income tax! The Court also bitch-slapped half the US Circuit Courts of Appeal in the process. A truly phenomenal decision! (Recorded December 4, 2024.)

                                                  [/copypasta]


                                                    5 ★ 13 ↺

                                                    [?]OCTADE » 🌐
                                                    @octade@soc.octade.net

                                                    SMUD - an appropriate name for the electric company conducting surveillance for the police.

                                                    The $94 Million Smart Meter Surveillance Scheme Exposed

                                                    https://youtu.be/onYWQJsWFpk

                                                    Sacramento residents discovered their utility company has been secretly feeding their private energy data to police without warrants, leading to a massive surveillance operation that generated $94 million in fines. This explosive investigation reveals how SMUD transformed smart meters into government spy devices, monitoring when you shower, sleep, or use appliances.

                                                    Innocent homeowners faced armed police raids for using electricity to power medical equipment or mine cryptocurrency. One resident was forced outside in his underwear at gunpoint, while another disabled veteran was threatened with arrest for refusing warrantless entry. The surveillance threshold dropped dramatically from 7,000 to just 2,800 kilowatt hours per month, making air conditioning use suspicious in Sacramento's brutal heat.

                                                    Internal documents expose how SMUD analysts actively mined customer data for police, checking over 10,000 homes in a single month. Despite California law explicitly prohibiting utilities from sharing precise meter data without warrants, SMUD violated these protections daily for a decade.

                                                    The Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit could reshape smart meter privacy nationwide. With the October 2025 court decision approaching, every American with a smart meter needs to understand how their utility company might be spying on them right now.

                                                    @privacy@a.gup.pe @infosec@a.gup.pe @infostorm@a.gup.pe