soc.octade.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
social@octade.net

Search results for tag #scotus

Jeff Pummill boosted

[?]WIST Quotations » 🌐
@wistquotes@friendica.world

A quotation from Hugo Black

In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.

Hugo Black (1886–1971) American politician and jurist, US Supreme Court Justice (1937–71)
New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713, 717 (1971) (concurring)


More about this quote: wist.info/black-hugo/36400/

The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. - Hugo Black

Alt...The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. - Hugo Black

    [?]Philosophics » 🌐
    @microglyphics@mastodon.social

    « We repeat today what we have held before: An officer may enter a home without a warrant if he has “an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury.” »

    What's wrong with this statement – and I don't mean the morality of it.

    brywillis634737.substack.com/p

      [?]Nonilex » 🌐
      @Nonilex@masto.ai

      More than a dozen families of multiple faiths sued to block the after it was signed by Gov (R) last year. They argued the statute violates the ban on the government establishing , known as the , & improperly forced the faith onto students.

      The families are being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, & Americans United, a group that advocates for the .

        [?]Nonilex » 🌐
        @Nonilex@masto.ai

        The case would be one of the most significant dealing with in since an ideologically divided ruled in 2022 that a former public high school football coach’s on-field prayers were protected under the ’s right to .
        In the current case, the [ultra-conservative] US Court of Appeals for the in New Orleans upheld the on a 9-8 vote, overturning a lower-court ruling that found the measure .

          [?]Nonilex » 🌐
          @Nonilex@masto.ai

          The justices are expected to decide in coming months whether to take up the case, which is being closely watched as conservatives…work to expand “rights” [ ] in public spaces & opponents battle them in court. In April, a conservative appeals court upheld the law in a narrowly divided opinion.

            muddle 🥣 boosted

            [?]Nonilex » 🌐
            @Nonilex@masto.ai

            Be afraid. Be very afraid.

            asked to hear case on requiring in

            
The case could set up a landmark clash over the .

            With this , I truly fear the outcome.


            wapo.st/4xaYNcK

              [?]Nonilex » 🌐
              @Nonilex@masto.ai

              groups Monday asked to hear their challenge of a requiring that all ’ classrooms display the , potentially setting up a landmark clash over the .

                JJDavis :terminal: boosted

                [?]Anna Anthro » 🌐
                @AnnaAnthro@mastodon.social

                justice Alito took undisclosed luxury fishing trip to with Billionaire Paul Singer before Singer’s cases came before the Court

                propublica.org/article/samuel-

                  [?]CCIA » 🌐
                  @CCIAnet@techpolicy.social

                  CCIA’s Director of the Litigation Center Burke Kappler examines a recent Supreme Court ruling that expands our rights in the digital age. ’ ruling in Chatrie v. United States is a significant win for digital privacy, reaffirming that handing information to a tech company for one purpose does not mean handing it to the government for another. ccianet.org/articles/the-supre

                    [?]The New Oil » 🤖 🌐
                    @thenewoil@mastodon.thenewoil.org

                    [?]Indigo Privacy » 🌐
                    @indigoprivacy@mastodon.social

                    The Supreme Court is letting Texas enforce its App Store Accountability Act. Under-18s need a parent's OK to download any app. To spot minors, though, Apple and Google must age-verify everyone. Like carding every customer at the bookstore door, a judge said.

                      [?]Kent Pitman » 🌐
                      @kentpitman@climatejustice.social

                      Today, in lieu of scheduled celebrations of a US that is held hostage by forces bent on dismantling democracy, I am re-posting an essay I wrote in September 2024, prior to the last election, about the considerable repair work that American democracy needs to protect itself from tyrants.

                      netsettlement.blogspot.com/202

                        muddle 🥣 boosted

                        [?]Texas Observer » 🌐
                        @TexasObserver@texasobserver.social

                        The latest from Texas Observer cartoonist Ben Sargent.

                        See more from Loon Star State: texasobserver.org/topics/loon-

                        A burly Ku Klux Klan member in white robes with the signature red cross sits atop a heap of dirt marked The South, holding a noose in one hand and a copy of the Louisiana v. Callais decision of the United States Supreme Court. Next to him is a small crow, wearing a MAGA-red hat that's labelled "Jim." In big, evocative letters, the Klan member declares, "I'm Back Baby!!"

                        Alt...A burly Ku Klux Klan member in white robes with the signature red cross sits atop a heap of dirt marked The South, holding a noose in one hand and a copy of the Louisiana v. Callais decision of the United States Supreme Court. Next to him is a small crow, wearing a MAGA-red hat that's labelled "Jim." In big, evocative letters, the Klan member declares, "I'm Back Baby!!"

                          oheso boosted

                          [?]Flipboard Culture Desk » 🌐
                          @CultureDesk@flipboard.social

                          On June 30, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against 16-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson, who had been fighting for five years to compete on her school's girls' track team as a transgender athlete. James Dale lost at the same court 26 years ago, after he had been expelled from the Boy Scouts for being gay. Here's an open letter from Dale to Pepper-Jackson, showing his support and admiration for her.

                          flip.it/sYrSa8

                            muddle 🥣 boosted

                            [?]Trump & Epstein: Biz partners. » 🌐
                            @MugsysRapSheet@mastodon.social

                            DAMN STRAIGHT! 👍

                            leftylady.bsky.social wrote:

Clarence Thomas says the 14th Amendment should be read narrowly because it was written for formerly enslaved people.

By that logic, the 2nd Amendment was written for muskets, not AR-15s. Funny how that kind of originalism only shows up when it's convenient.

                            Alt...leftylady.bsky.social wrote: Clarence Thomas says the 14th Amendment should be read narrowly because it was written for formerly enslaved people. By that logic, the 2nd Amendment was written for muskets, not AR-15s. Funny how that kind of originalism only shows up when it's convenient.

                              [?]Mark Wyner Won’t Comply :vm: » 🌐
                              @markwyner@mas.to

                              This is a privacy victory. It deserves to be celebrated. The Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment, 6–3.

                              scotusblog.com/2026/06/court-r

                              However, there’s a hidden detail that is worth flagging. And it’s not good.

                              This ruling arose from Chatrie v United States. Google gave generic cell phone records to the cops. No specificity means unconstitutional. Maybe.

                              The federal judge on the case agreed that it was unconstitutional. But she allowed evidence from the violation to be used anyway. Why? She cited that “even if there had been a violation of the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officials had acted in good faith.”

                              In. Good. Faith.

                              This translates to “cops can violate the constitution if we believe their intentions are good.”

                              How many cops do you know who act in good faith?

                                [?]The New Oil » 🤖 🌐
                                @thenewoil@mastodon.thenewoil.org

                                muddle 🥣 boosted

                                [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                YES!!!!!!

                                🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
                                Monday declined to take up an appeal from over a $5 million verdict & finding that he sexually abused & defamed , a decision that means Trump will now HAVE TO PAY the magazine columnist.
                                🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

                                cnn.com/2026/06/29/politics/e-

                                  [?]Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬 » 🌐
                                  @BenjaminHCCarr@hachyderm.io

                                  In major win, rules are protected by privacy rights
                                  In the 6-3 ruling, said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
                                  techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-m

                                    muddle 🥣 boosted

                                    [?]Peter Gleick » 🌐
                                    @petergleick@fediscience.org

                                    It isn't just democracy, voting rights, civil rights and and the Constitution that this Supreme Court is destroying. It's also .

                                    pbs.org/newshour/show/what-sci

                                      [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                      @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                      struckdown a requiring people to get permission to carry into stores & hotels, in its latest opinion backing rights.

                                      The court’s 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto privately owned property like shopping malls & gas stations, unless the owners specifically say guns are banned at their establishments.

                                      It’s a win for the admin, which argued the law violates the . It’s also a win for planners.

                                      apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

                                        oheso boosted

                                        [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                        @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                        I guess it’s only protected if it’s *their* .

                                        rules man can’t sue Louisiana prison officials who cut his dreadlocks.


                                        apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

                                          1 ★ 0 ↺

                                          [?]OCTADE » 🌐
                                          @octade@soc.octade.net

                                          We interrupt your regularly scheduled fearmongering to bring you this important message:

                                          SCOTUS rules that ordinary Americans do NOT owe income tax!

                                          https://youtu.be/bTLYcr-JuDc

                                          SCOTUS just contradicted a century of circuit courts and their malicious rulings subjecting Americans to the income tax. Will anyone notice?

                                          [copypasta]

                                          Dr Champion shows you the astounding words of a recent US Supreme Court decision, in which the Court explains why Americans need not pay income tax! The Court also bitch-slapped half the US Circuit Courts of Appeal in the process. A truly phenomenal decision! (Recorded December 4, 2024.)

                                          [/copypasta]


                                            5 ★ 13 ↺

                                            [?]OCTADE » 🌐
                                            @octade@soc.octade.net

                                            SMUD - an appropriate name for the electric company conducting surveillance for the police.

                                            The $94 Million Smart Meter Surveillance Scheme Exposed

                                            https://youtu.be/onYWQJsWFpk

                                            Sacramento residents discovered their utility company has been secretly feeding their private energy data to police without warrants, leading to a massive surveillance operation that generated $94 million in fines. This explosive investigation reveals how SMUD transformed smart meters into government spy devices, monitoring when you shower, sleep, or use appliances.

                                            Innocent homeowners faced armed police raids for using electricity to power medical equipment or mine cryptocurrency. One resident was forced outside in his underwear at gunpoint, while another disabled veteran was threatened with arrest for refusing warrantless entry. The surveillance threshold dropped dramatically from 7,000 to just 2,800 kilowatt hours per month, making air conditioning use suspicious in Sacramento's brutal heat.

                                            Internal documents expose how SMUD analysts actively mined customer data for police, checking over 10,000 homes in a single month. Despite California law explicitly prohibiting utilities from sharing precise meter data without warrants, SMUD violated these protections daily for a decade.

                                            The Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit could reshape smart meter privacy nationwide. With the October 2025 court decision approaching, every American with a smart meter needs to understand how their utility company might be spying on them right now.

                                            @privacy@a.gup.pe @infosec@a.gup.pe @infostorm@a.gup.pe