Given these days you can't even expect #Gentoo contributors to be respectable, I'm working on adding a git hook that rejects commits with #LLM attribution. Could you help me find all the common patterns used to mark LLM-assisted #git commits?

So far I'm checking for author and Co-authored-by using the following e-mail patterns:

• copilot@github.com
• *@anthropic.com
• claude@users.noreply.github.com
• *+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com
• *@openai.com
• *+chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]@users.noreply.github.com
• *@cursor.com
• *@x.ai
• *@google.com

I think some people came up with some other tags to mark LLM commits but can't find that right now.

EDIT: added Assisted-by.

#NoAI #NoLLM #AI

Colleges and universities use document revision history (or lack thereof) as one mechanism to check for AI use in document creation.

More technically adept students use Pandoc, Org-Mode, or LaTeX and a git repo, which has no in-document revision history when converted to an .ODT or .DOCX file.

Is there a way to capture git revision history and merge it into a .DOCX or .ODT file's internal revision history.

Seeking a defense against profs who don't know git.

#askfedi #git #ai #education

Forgejo: https://forgejo.org ...

"Forgejo is a Free Software platform for collaboration and productivity in software development. It offers a familiar environment to GitHub users, easy installation and maintenance, and a focus on security, scaling, federation and privacy."

... codeberg has a nice setup (via forgejo) if you don't want to self-host.

#git #forgejo #scm #vcs #sources #source #code #vps #gitlab #github #codeberg #hosting