Just one more LLM, bro. Just one more LLM and this code will surely work fine!

https://github.com/osquery/osquery/issues/8939

#AI #LLM #NoAI #NoLLM #slop

I recently switched to #kdeplasma. I'm impressed! I even managed to get #Wayland working with my #Nvidia card (with the help of an #LLM). I stopped using KDE over 20 years ago, but it was my main #Linux desktop for years. It's the complete opposite of #Gnome or light DEs like #XFCE. I'm really enjoying it. It's refreshing to have a #desktopenvironment that doesn't treat me like I'm too stupid to deal with options. Anyway, KDE is really good!

@EUCommission

The #EuropeanCommission advertises as "open-source" an #LLM which -by their own call- need only provide, "where applicable, the release of open weights, .. OR .. technical documentation" [1].

So the result is open-weights at most, and would not even satisfy the OSI Open Source AI Definition (#OSAID 1.0).

This is not the first time the EC's claims don't survive scrutiny.

An institution funding "sovereign AI" at scale should know the difference.

[1] https://aiboost-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/AI-BOOST-_Guidelines-for-Applicants_FRONTIER-AI-CHALLENGE.pdf

Alt...

The EC disabled quote-posts, so here is a screenshot of their original toot.

Alt...

Screenshot of "The project will develop an open-source artificial intelligence (AI) model" from the EC press release: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-selects-europa-consortium-winner-frontier-ai-grande-challenge-project-build-european#:~:text=The%20European%20Commission%20has%20selected,all%2024%20official%20EU%20languages.

#LLM agents violate Hammerstein's Law, clause 4:

"One must beware of anyone who is both stupid and hardworking; he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always only cause damage."

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Kurt_von_Hammerstein-Equord

#Firefox #AI #Chatbot feature exposed users to #email theft risk

https://cyberinsider.com/firefox-ai-chatbot-feature-exposed-users-to-email-theft-risk/

#privacy #cybersecurity #LLM #Mozilla

RE: https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/116775461671762518

I've known about this back in early 2024 and it was pretty awesome first time I tried it, albeit with a really small model since I only had a 1050 Ti, Ryzen 3 1300X and 16 gigs of ram back then. I was getting like < 5 tk/s.

I mean it's to be expected but it's better than nothing when we don't have internet which happens sometimes.

This stuff's been out there for a while that I'm a little surprised people are only catching up with local stuffs

#ai #localllm #llm

If you hit a writer's block, it's because you don't know something. Learn something!

And don't for the love of god try to fix it by using a fucking #LLM

#noAi #ai #art #writersblock

Почти хороший документ от SFC про рекомендации касательно LLM в FOSS проектах.

https://social.sfconservancy.org/objects/3ac6d3b8-798b-4d85-91a1-7103abe76548

Почему "почти"?

Потому что практически все пункты стараются балансировать между "pro-AI" и "anti-AI" позициями, но первым пунктом стоит:

The FOSS community should support, not just tolerate, those who outright reject LLM-gen-AI systems

А вот почему-то про поддержку тех, кто пользуется LLM ничего не говорится.

В целом я могу понять это и принять как политический поклон в сторону тех, кто устраивает истерику, но если заглянуть к ним в комменты, то видно, что это всё равно не помогло:

LOL WTF NOPE

FOSS projects should not shun contributors who choose to use LLM-gen-AI systems.

🤡

kinda stopped reading after

There are many intersecting ethical and moral issues regarding these systems, many of which are not currently fully understood

They are well understood and visible

I'm going to state this very clearly:
Projects/communities have an absolute right to exclude people whose behaviors they deem unethical, unsafe, or hostile from participation.
And deeming LLM-gen-AI use as unethical is a completely reasonable position.

Они для себя всё уже решили, сколько ты их ни пытайся уважать и не раскланивайся.

Меня, если честно, именно вот это желание всех неугодных выгнать и в гетто согнать от тех, кто декларирует высокую мораль и раздражает. По модулю они ничем не отличаются от того, чем клеймят тех, кто им не угодил.

Я бы ради общего блага и сообщества FOSS без проблем бы пошёл на компромиссы и уважительное отношение даже к тем, кто пользуется самыми тупыми аргументами.

Пойдут ли эти люди на компромиссы в отношении тех, кого объявили вне морали и этики?

#thought #log #SFC #LLM #GenAI #FOSS #dev #politics #radicalism

@bkuhn @conservancy @dalias

> While it was surely unintentional, your reply is quite similar to the cruelty of traditional #FreeSoftware rhetoric — wherein we shunned people for using #Apple & #Microsoft. Such users deserve sympathy and help toward more software freedom.
>
> Same goes for #LLM-backed generative #AI users.

Sorry, I usually really value your opinions on stuff, as you tend to run contrary to the so-pragmatic-they'd-pimp-their-own-mothers attitude that is far too prevalent in (F)OSS, but hard disagree.

There's a big difference between knocking someone for using a MacBook and knocking someone for using an LLM.

Using a MacBook harms the user in ways that are somewhat debatable. Its harm outside of the user is very negligible and even more debatable.

Using LLMs harms us all. I don't doubt that there are valid and ethical applications for LLMs in many sectors, but you don't build a giant baby shredder on top of an indigenous burial ground and then suddenly pivot to saying, "But wait, it can process potatoes, too!"

If we're not talking about the theft of human creativity, the theft of potable water, the theft of human labor and wages, the promotion of über-fascist plutocrats, and all of the other horrendous harms associated with LLMs, then we're not talking about LLMs. We're engaging in some kind of fantasy roleplay.

Respectfully,

—Some dingbat named Dane, or something, who loves humanity and freedom.

In a policy statement¹, @conservancy said:
> “#FOSS projects should not shun contributors who choose to use LLM-gen-AI systems.”

@dalias' reply:
>> “LOL WTF NOPE. 🤡”

While it was surely unintentional, your reply is quite similar to the cruelty of traditional #FreeSoftware rhetoric — wherein we shunned people for *using* #Apple & #Microsoft. Such users deserve sympathy and help toward more software freedom.

Same goes for #LLM-backed generative #AI users.

¹ https://sfconservancy.org/llm-gen-ai/llm-backed-generative-ai-recommendations.html

#OpenSource

When you're building software aimed at a niche related to hype, the only thing you can do is hook people onto it. I mean, you're targeting the kind people who have an attention span of a fruit fly. Unless they're literally addicted to your software, they're going to forget it as soon as they notice the next shiny thing.

#AI #LLM #NoAI #NoLLM #FreeSoftware #OpenSource

GLM 5.2 is really ripping it in benchmarks. For being roughly Opus-tier it's not as big as you'd think (~750B-A40B). All those bastards that shelled out for a 512GB mac studio can run it at home.

#llm

#OpenAI investigated by coalition of state attorneys general

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/openai-investigated-by-coalition-of-state-attorneys-general/ar-AA25wmMD

#privacy #AI #ChatGPT #LLM

Given these days you can't even expect #Gentoo contributors to be respectable, I'm working on adding a git hook that rejects commits with #LLM attribution. Could you help me find all the common patterns used to mark LLM-assisted #git commits?

So far I'm checking for author and Co-authored-by using the following e-mail patterns:

• copilot@github.com
• *@anthropic.com
• claude@users.noreply.github.com
• *+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com
• *@openai.com
• *+chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]@users.noreply.github.com
• *@cursor.com
• *@x.ai
• *@google.com

I think some people came up with some other tags to mark LLM commits but can't find that right now.

EDIT: added Assisted-by.

#NoAI #NoLLM #AI

some time ago i (half) joked that the only job #llm can replace outright is the CEO.

today i attended an earnings call where a synthetised voice of our CEO read multi-page long table of numbers from an official financial document, according to a script prepared by claude, over a single slide titled "company earnings 2025" - to a room full of employees who commuted to the office to watch it in person. there was no management present or even shown on the screen.

it was the most disturbed dystopian fucking thing i've experienced in my career of working for soul-crushing corporations.

What a good read!

> A growing economy used to be a rising tide that lifted all boats. Post-AI, it may only lift a handful of yachts.

It's really long, but very well worth it. Puts some real substance and lessons from history against arguments, to try and paint an extrapolated picture of what #BigAI will likely do to us and our society.

**A true risk that #AI poses to liberal democracies.**

https://matthewbutterick.com/extinction-level-capitalism.html

#GenAI #LLM #BigTech

LLMs don't "know" anything. They're just guessing the next word. 🤯

But that guess is built from 100B+ parameters, trained on basically the internet.

We explain how it works, why it lies sometimes, and how to run one (Gemma 4 / Qwen 3.6) on your own PC.
https://geekrealmhub.com/what-is-llm-guide-large-language-models-local-ai/

#AI #LLM #Tech

I don't like #AI. I think it's problematic in a lot of ways, that I won't repeat here as I believe you heard these (very much true) arguments 100 times.

But #DuckAI helped me quite a lot yesterday, and I don't know how to feel about that. By curiosity, I made it write #elisp code to create new useful commands for #emacs which will help me in my everyday work (for example `C-c m` now creates a PDF using `pdfmom -k` so I don't have to use a terminal at the same time when I use #groff, `C-c t` adds `/|` before some punctuations signs following French typographic rules, …). These functions are very simple, most of you here could have written them by hand in less time than it took me to write the prompts, but I'm no developer, and don't have the time to become one, unfortunately. They work as intended (I can control that as, again, they're simple things), and I more or less understand them, as the #LLM described them. I even asked it questions to understand some parts of the code, and it answered (correctly it seems; I checked and as far as I can know, its answers seem legit), so I was able to modify them by hand to fine-tune them. One was wrong, but when I sent it the error message, it corrected it and explained the error to me.

It didn't feel like I was relinquishing brain power; in the contrary I learnt things. I could have done that by hand, and I would have learnt far more, but it would have taken months and I don't have months: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

I still think that LLMs are a problem for our societies, but even more so than I thought as it seems to be actually useful in some cases.

Anthropic has suspended access to its latest models, Mythos 5 and Fable 5, for all users after the US government demanded that non-US citizens, both in the US and abroad, should not be able to use the LLMs, citing national security concerns.

https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2026/ai/us-shutdown-of-anthropic-models-sparks-fresh-concerns-over-ai-sovereignty?utm_source=mastodon_org&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=June_Anthropic

#technews #mythos #anthropic #fable #llm #ai

It doesn’t matter if it works - by Henry From Online

https://henry.codes/writing/it-doesnt-matter-if-it-works/

Deskilling:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deskilling

"In economics, deskilling is the process by which skilled labor within an industry or economy is eliminated by the introduction of technologies operated by semi-skilled or unskilled workers. This results in cost savings due to lower investment in human capital, and reduces barriers to entry, weakening the bargaining power of the human capital."

#Society #Capitalism #AI #LLM #LLMs

Why run LLMs locally?

#ai #llm #llamacpp #localai #digitalsovereignty

Alt...

Why run LLMs locally? Pros: Privacy, Security, Cost control, Control over models used, Consistent quality of answers, No advertising, No vendor lock-in Cons: Not as scalable as the cloud providers, Not suitable for very big models

I've seen where Torvalds said that he considers them as just another tool in the Arsenal, he doesn't really care, if the code is good.

He doesn't want his time to be wasted  He'll scream and shout if an LLM creates that time pit

These following words an extreme version of me would say

It looks like you will have to stop using Linux. Since from your perspective anything that uses remotely an LLM is bad, you will have to stop, otherwise you will contribute to the environment being destroyed willingly and actively

In practice that is impossible. If you drive a modern car it has the Linux kernel. If you have a smart TV or more you're also using the tainted kernel. Even if you have a stick which also streams or a camera you will have a Linux kernel in many cases.

These LLMs are an infection of the planet's  code base

Since you're already using BSD a solution would be to cut using Linux on your computers drastically

@rl_dane @FranklinFrank

#LLM #slop #hallucinations #AI #programming #coding

Point me please, to projects which are heavily dependent on LLM code generation which are older than 10 years.

The Linux distributions I use,  have no code which is 100% LLM generated

@rl_dane @FranklinFrank

#LLM #slop #hallucinations #AI #programming #coding

So when #Anthropic can't buy #GNU Toolchain project wholesome, it can always buy its developers.

Oh wait, this mail that starts with Anthropic marketing bullshit is not "an endorsement of Anthropic". And you're not permitted to criticize him.

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2026-June/178028.html

#NoAI #NoLLM #AI #LLM

#interview #interviews #ai #llm #claude #systemdesign

Don't use LLM for writing cryptographic code. You have been warned.

#cryptography #AI #LLM