soc.octade.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.
This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.
Surveillance glasses recording people without their knowledge and consent, and especially if they collect nonconsensual data using AI or facial recognition, need to be banned and illegal to sell everywhere.
Tell your local representatives they need to outlaw this harmful technology.
Privacy is a human right.
We need to defend it.
#NoAI #MassSurveillance #BanRayBan #Meta #CreepGlasses #Privacy
We need a noncommercial AI-free parallel internet curated by librarians.
Created and consulted by humans only.
It's the only way
#LLM users be like:
Why are you accusing me of supporting slavery? I never said I support slavery. I merely buy cheap tobacco! It's not my fault that all the cheap tobacco is coming from slave-driven plantations! Find me a cheaper tobacco that's manufactured ethically, and I'll surely switch over!
Smokers are being persecuted again! All we wish for is for people to respect our constitutional right to poison everyone around us! Is it really that much?!
Big Privacy Guides News! 👕✨
After many requests, we finally have a MERCH STORE!
This is a new way to support us
while making a public statement (in style) about privacy rights ✊🔒
We have a few designs to choose from already, and ZERO AI was used in the creation process!
The Defender of Privacy design
was created by me personally, from love, joy, and hard work, using a human brain.
I hope you like it! 💛 https://shop.privacyguides.org
#PrivacyGuides #Privacy #Merch #Donation #NonProfit #NoAI #MastodonArt #HumanArt
I am so disappointed with so many companies that I used to consider privacy and security defending companies, jumping on the AI bandwagon. In my latest search for a new search engine, I found that most, not all, but most, are now pushing AI.
And to the search companies describing their AI search services as "privacy respecting search", how can it be privacy respecting when you're using AI, which steals data to train models, as "privacy respecting"?
Get out of here with your unethical bullshit.
So what this means for people who love the art form of recording an album and thrive in the process of composing, arranging and producing recordings is basically:
We're fucked, it's over.
Well that might very well be but I still refuse to believe it.
I mean, what else can I do.
Ok, I'm on Gamer+ using Vivaldi. If firefox had dedicated to no AI Slop I might still be using it. Instead I'm using Libre Wolf and checking out Vivaldi.
The most annoying thing about corporate surveillance to me is the arrogance of the prediction mechanisms.
These algorithms build a model of me based on my clicks from three years ago and then try to trap me in that loop forever. They show me music they think I'll like, and news they think I'll engage with, and videos they think will enrage me enough to keep me hooked to their platforms. They are actively trying to flatten my personality into something easy to monetize.
As most people I've seen say out loud, "Privacy as a concept is way beyond hiding secrets. A part of it also means preserving your capacity to change. To be surprised. To be inconsistent."
If I could tell every human one thing, it would be to actively refuse to be a predictable data point. Mess up their metrics. In whatever way you are capable of.
#socialmedia #algorithmicbias #privacy #dataprivacy #quotes #foss #facebook #linkedin #llm #noai #enshittification #reading #books #baking #art #philosophy #adhd #depression #cybersecurity
AI assistants are the archnemesis
of data privacy.
Because AI models are inherent
data collectors.
They rely on large data collection for training, improvement, operation, and customization.
More often than not, this data is collected without clear and informed consent (from unknowing training subjects or from platform users). This data is then sent to and accessed by a private company with many incentives to share and monetize this data.
By using these platforms, we are encouraging them to collect even more nonconsensual data on everyone. This is an important social responsibility to consider. Choose carefully.
@nixCraft First they force that crap onto the world and make people 'dependent' on it, and then - of course - ads. Because ads make the world go round, now at the cost of insane energy consumption.
Blagh. I've never used it and everything my coworkers handed me 'from crapgpt' failed gloriously. It's not for me.
So, "#AI boosted your productivity"? Well, are you a software developer or a factory worker?
Productivity is a measure of predictable output from repetitive processes. It is how much shit your factory floor produces. Of course, once attempts to boost productivity start affecting the quality of your product, things get hairy…
"Productivity" makes no sense for creative work. It makes zero sense for software developers. If your work is defined by productivity, then it makes no sense to use as #LLM to improve it. You can be replaced entirely.
Artists get that. The fact that many software developers don't suggests that the trade took a wrong turn at some point.
Inspired by https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/06/1000x-liability/#graceful-failure-modes (via https://23.social/@thomasfricke/115853480750134056).
There will never be an AI tool that
is truly private unless it hasn't trained on nonconsensual data.
Even if a platform were able to
create the perfect protections for its users' prompts and results,
If the platform is built from or utilizing an AI model that was trained on or is updated and optimized with data that was scraped from millions of people without their consent, then of course this platform isn't "privacy-respectful."
How could it be?
The company is saying:
"We respect the privacy of our users while they are using our platform, but outside of it, it's fair game."
Users thinking they are using a privacy-respectful platform are in fact saying:
"Privacy for me and not for thee,"
And are directly contributing to the platform needing to scrape even more nonconsensual data to improve.
Always ask: Where the training data comes from?
Without the assurance that a platform only uses AI models that have only been training on data acquired ethically, it is not a privacy-respectful platform.
2026 will see #deMicrosoft trending - what's your pick?
#NoAI #MS365 #DigitalSovereignty #OpenSource
Not ready to pay increased prices for AI? Choose alternatives: https://tuta.com/blog/microsoft-365-price-increase
Is anyone else completely exhausted by the "Suggested For You" era of the web?
I feel like 2025 broke something in my tolerance for algorithmic feeds. I caught myself scrolling my personal insta yesterday and realized I hadn't seen a post from an actual human friend in ten minutes. It was just engagement bait and AI-generated slop. Uggh!
Thinking about moving my web reading habits to RSS.
#RSS #indieweb #enshittification #privacy #noai #selfhosted #linux #sysadmin
Hey @fdroidorg , What the fuck is this???
I'm not glad to be using a fascist company-supporting app store on my device.
I might be the minority here but I feel like if Firefox shipped with AI shit enabled but a huge "DISABLE AI" button you could press to turn it off... I might be okay with that.
If the alternative is (almost) every other browser having AI and no way to turn it off, is a "DISABLE AI" button a win?
It would let the people who care disable it. People who don't care could also disable it, we just need to tell them how and why they should.
1/n
I am dreaming of a somehow human-curated privacy-respectful search engine that returns results that are free from all this intolerable AI-slop soup pollution, simply while using good old keywords.
Wouldn't that be great?
Wouldn't that be the future? 😌🌱
First this...
"AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off."
And then this...
"Firefox will [...] evolve into a modern AI browser."
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/leadership/mozillas-next-chapter-anthony-enzor-demeo-new-ceo/
I am so stubborn about not using AI.
You have no idea.
I will even go as far as writing my own texts, drawing my own images, writing my own code, and reading the whole article or email just by myself. Crazy stuff.
Do you know what RFCs are? Request For Comments are how Internet standards are made... and now they are available via Gemini Protocol. Come and read them at
gemini://gem.snork.ca/rfc-editor.org
Can you think of any other text content that should be available via Gemini? let me know and I'll see what I can do!
It took a long time to manually convert the html files to a gmi-happy format, but I have finally made all of textfiles.com available via Gemini Protocol (not the Google garbage). Please go read some textfiles! :-)
PS: If you find any problems please don't hassle Jason about it. I would guess that it is a result of my html-to-gmi translation, so hassle me instead.
PS2: If there is any other text-heavy or text-only content you'd like to see on Gemini let me know and I'll see what I can do.
RE: https://jawns.club/@karschsp/115587483751106608
First #deGoogle, then #GoEuropean, now #NoAI
And #Tuta ticks all the boxes. Just saying. 😉
Politicians:
Terrified about citizens that might be sending private messages they cannot read on Signal -> Sudden panic about "protecting the children" 🙃
Also politicians:
Grok AI Chatbot collects data and asks for nudes from a 12-year old -> AI is innovation! We should invest billions in taxpayers money in it! 💰💰💰
https://www.cbc.ca/news/investigates/tesla-grok-mom-9.6956930
If your product doesn't use any AI at all,
you will be ahead of the curve.
And you should brag about it.
Earlier this week #TeenVogue was folded into #Vogue US and its parent company #CondeNast fired 6 reporters who fearlessly covered politics, speaking truth to power ("coincidentally" they were mostly BIPOC women or trans). Talk about capitulating to the current political climate.
I know it's not much, but this morning I canceled my #WIRED & #NewYorker subscriptions (also owned by Condé Nast)... and made sure to let them know my reason. Plus I added a note about their awful AI narrations #noAI
Check out my new shirt!
👕
Destroy AI!
• Bad at Everything! 👎
• Kills the Planet! 🌍
• Brain Atrophy! 🧠
Artist: https://octophant.us/
Order one too: https://octophant.threadless.com/designs/destroy-a-i/
Thanks to @tante for the fantastic recommendation! https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/114863463868788391
Edit: I just discovered the artist has an account here! You can follow here: @PhineasX
Peace
https://karen-kaspar.pixels.com/featured/peace-karen-kaspar.html
#peace #peaceful #freedom #happiness #goodvibes #positiveVibes #MastoArt #art #painting #FediArt #FediGiftShop #artist #arte #InteriorDesign #MastodonArt #BuyIntoArt #ArtistsOnMastodon #TraditionalArt #kunst #contemporaryArt #creativeToots #monochrome #abstract #abstractart #colors #noAI
Snake-oil AI systems are starting to make a joke of the presumption of innocence.
It should be illegal to implement an automated system that regularly incriminates innocents. This comes with sometimes severe consequences and trauma for the people wrongly flagged.
If we do not push back against this,
we are going to lose this right (yes, worse than it is now I mean).
Before listening to the advice of an AI Chatbot, you should wonder who has power over this AI Chatbot and who can control its output.
AI isn't magic.
There are humans behind this.
Humans with motives and goals.
If you listen to the AI and the AI listens to Sam Altman or Elon Musk, who are you truly getting advice from?