soc.octade.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
social@octade.net

Search results for tag #privacy

[?]itgrrl :donor: [she / her] » 🌐
@itgrrl@infosec.exchange

the arseholes over at / aren’t clueless & naive techies, they’re actively pursuing harmful & unpopular tech in pursuit of money & power like cartoon villains… 🧐

Meta Plans to Add Technology to Its Smart Glasses

“Five years ago, Facebook shut down the facial recognition system for tagging people in photos on its social network, saying it wanted to find “the right balance” for a technology that raises and legal concerns.

Now it wants to bring facial recognition back.

Meta’s internal memo said the political tumult in the United States was good timing for the feature’s release.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” according to the document from Meta’s Reality Labs, which works on hardware including smart glasses.”

nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technol


 

    [?]Em :official_verified: » 🌐
    @Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange

    Age Verification isn't a technical problem to solve. If you think that, you're missing the point.

    It's a social problem used by authoritarian governments as an excuse for population control and censorship.

    It's a fundamental attack on free speech and democracy.

    It must not be accommodated.
    It must be stopped.

      [?]Erik Jonker » 🌐
      @ErikJonker@mastodon.social

      [?]Brian Sletten » 🌐
      @bsletten@mastodon.social

      Hey, maybe don’t verify yourself on LinkedIn. What an absolute shitshow:

      thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedi

        [?]Sammiej » 🌐
        @capitainesam@mastodon.social

        Discord problem: Wants government ID + facial recognition

        Snugg solution: Zero identity requirements

        No real name. No phone number. No government ID. No facial recognition.

        Just a username.

        Can't leak what we don't collect.

        snugg.social/join

          [?]Sammiej » 🌐
          @capitainesam@mastodon.social

          Cookie banner problem: Consent is annoying, 99% click "Accept All"

          Snugg solution: No consent banner needed

          Why? Because there's NO TRACKING to consent to.

          No cookies. No fingerprinting. No surveillance.
          Just the app working.

            [?]Barbara Monaco » 🌐
            @Barbramon1@mas.to

            Not exactly reassuring. DHS attempting to consolidate all of its biometric data, including fingerprints, facial recognition data, and iris scans.




            wired.com/story/dhs-wants-a-si

              [?]Zak :1password: » 🌐
              @zak@infosec.exchange

              Quick privacy reminder: at any time, you can search your email inbox for the word "unsubscribe" to find emails that have no business being in your inbox that you can actually get rid of. Use the provided links and get yourself off of a bunch of email lists all at once. It's super satisfying and it works because it's a legal requirement.

                [?]Em :official_verified: » 🌐
                @Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange

                Facial Recognition is slowly
                getting embedded in most systems in the name of security.

                This needs to stop.

                Not only it will not help, but it will definitely harm a lot of innocent people: Identity theft and doxing when the inevitable data breaches happen. False positives, which can be very high and even higher for people of color. Normalized discrimination for many.

                We collectively need to
                refuse each time facial recognition is requested, and we need to write to our public representatives to demand better legislation against it.

                If we do not refuse to participate and
                we do not fight for our privacy rights collectively, we will lose them.

                Here's how it works for airports in the US: gizmodo.com/senators-say-tsas-

                  [?]Em :official_verified: » 🌐
                  @Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange

                  The craziness about private businesses collecting biometric data very unnecessarily for basic identification purposes needs to stop.

                  Say NO to biometrics collection everywhere you can 🚫✋

                  Privacy is a human right.

                    [?]Inkican » 🌐
                    @inkican@mastodon.social

                    Researchers warn Wi Fi signals could turn into an invisible mass surveillance grid. So even airplane mode might be lying to your characters. scitechdaily.com/researchers-w

                      [?]Sammiej » 🌐
                      @capitainesam@mastodon.social

                      Building social media that never needs to see your face.

                      No facial recognition.
                      No fingerprint scans.
                      No biometric surveillance.

                      Because your face is yours. Forever.

                      Founding member waitlist: snugg.social
                      Launch: March 2026

                        [?]Sammiej » 🌐
                        @capitainesam@mastodon.social

                        Meta Premium problem: Charges €6, keeps surveillance

                        Snugg solution: €5/month, zero tracking

                        We built end-to-end encryption so we physically CANNOT track you.

                        Not "won't track" (promises can change).
                        But "CAN'T track" (technically impossible).

                        That's privacy by design.

                          [?]Jon Snow » 🌐
                          @jonsnow@mastodon.online

                          Age verification vendor Persona left frontend exposed, researchers say

                          Runs facial recognition against watchlists and politically exposed persons, screens “adverse media” across 14 categories (including terrorism and espionage), and assigns risk and similarity scores.

                          "pRoTeCt tHe KiDs"

                          malwarebytes.com/blog/news/202

                            [?]ProdigalFrog » 🌐
                            @ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net

                            GrapheneOS can help you retake your privacy, right now. | Veronica Explains

                            (https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/privacy)

                            [?]Mysk🇨🇦🇩🇪 » 🌐
                            @mysk@mastodon.social

                            This can be interpreted in such a broad manner that even HTTPS could be considered a hostile act of “end-to-end” encryption 🇬🇧

                            NoToDigitalID:
                            BREAKING: Under British and UK Legislation anyone using or developing end-to-end encryption is now a “hostile actor”

                            Engagement in Hostile Activity

Since hostile activity does not require any knowledge or tasking by a
foreign state*30, the phenomenon of double-ignorance could arise. A person may be engaged in hostile activity if they do something which, unknown to them threatens, national security and which is in the interests of another State, also entirely in the dark. For example:


The developer of an app, whose selling point is end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications. It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage.

                            Alt...Engagement in Hostile Activity Since hostile activity does not require any knowledge or tasking by a foreign state*30, the phenomenon of double-ignorance could arise. A person may be engaged in hostile activity if they do something which, unknown to them threatens, national security and which is in the interests of another State, also entirely in the dark. For example: The developer of an app, whose selling point is end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications. It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage.

                              [?]GeneralX ⏳ » 🌐
                              @generalx@freeradical.zone

                              "I have been charged with allegedly destroying multiple "flock" cameras around the Suffolk, VA area."

                              "I have hired a lawyer and incurred some minor costs so far in the process."

                              "I welcome anything that is within someone's budget (if you are hurting in this economy, keep your money! Talk to your community about privacy and security instead)."
                              --
                              ...The Feeling When a fundraising campaign speaks directly to you.

                              gofundme.com/f/jeff-sovern-leg

                                [?]Sammiej » 🌐
                                @capitainesam@mastodon.social

                                This week I showed you 4 major privacy failures:

                                1. Meta Premium (€6, keeps tracking)
                                2. Cookie banners (made privacy worse)
                                3. X encryption (lies in marketing)
                                4. Discord (wants your face)

                                Every problem came from surveillance-based business models.

                                Here's how Snugg solves all of it:

                                snugg.social/join

                                  [?]Ami » 🌐
                                  @ami@mastodon.world

                                  The could stop the tomorrow and little would change.

                                  The are on people's faces, in stores and on doorbells. Devices on other devices and report on you as you move about.

                                  Facial recognition will be the eyes of every wearing a camera from

                                  What needs to change is .
                                  They need to appreciate instead of and realise you need it for good .

                                  The walls don't spy, but your neighbours' devices do.

                                  AI rendition of the digital panopticon

                                  Alt...AI rendition of the digital panopticon

                                    [?]:awesome:🐦‍🔥nemo™🐦‍⬛ 🇺🇦🍉 » 🌐
                                    @nemo@mas.to

                                    Predator spyware can secretly bypass iPhone’s camera/mic dots, raising fresh concerns over iOS privacy and targeted surveillance 🔍📱 Full story: cyberinsider.com/predator-spyw

                                      [?]PrivacyDigest » 🌐
                                      @PrivacyDigest@mas.to

                                      Wants a Single to Flag Faces and Across Agencies

                                      aims to combine its face and systems into one big platform—after dismantling centralized reviews and key limits on face recognition.

                                      wired.com/story/dhs-wants-a-si

                                        [?]Sammiej » 🌐
                                        @capitainesam@mastodon.social

                                        Alternatives to facial recognition that Discord could use:

                                        ✅ Credit card verification (proves 18+)
                                        ✅ Privacy-preserving age tokens
                                        ✅ ID check without biometric storage
                                        ✅ Parental consent systems

                                        Discord chose the MOST invasive option.

                                        This isn't about age verification. It's about normalising biometric surveillance.

                                          [?]secsolution » 🌐
                                          @secsolution@mastodon.social

                                          Privacy online, cresce la consapevolezza in Europa: nel 2025 il 76,9% degli utenti adotta misure di protezione: La tutela dei dati personali online e’ sempre piu’ centrale per i cittadini europei. Nel 2025 il 76,9% degli utenti Internet dell’Unione Europea ha adottato almeno...
                                          dlvr.it/TR4dWc

                                            Lightfighter boosted

                                            [?]Hacker News » 🤖 🌐
                                            @h4ckernews@mastodon.social

                                            [?]Freezenet » 🌐
                                            @freezenet@noc.social

                                            Discords Persona Age Verification Suffers Data Leak, Exposes Massive Surveillance System

                                            What’s worse than having one massive security incident associated with Discord? How about a second security incident.

                                            freezenet.ca/discords-persona-

                                            @Paulatics

                                              [?]Sammiej » 🌐
                                              @capitainesam@mastodon.social

                                              When your password leaks:
                                              → Change your password
                                              → Problem solved

                                              When your biometric data leaks:
                                              → You can't change your face
                                              → You can't change your fingerprints
                                              → The compromise is permanent
                                              → Your biometric data is in breach databases forever

                                              This is why facial recognition for age verification is dangerous.

                                                [?]Privacy Guides » 🌐
                                                @privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

                                                🎙️🔴Episode #41 of This Week in Privacy is live in 30 minutes, we'll be covering the latest privacy issues and chasing with the community. Come say hi! 👋

                                                streamyard.com/watch/7G9buCsa7

                                                  [?]Privacy Guides » 🌐
                                                  @privacyguides.org@bsky.brid.gy

                                                  🎙️🔴Episode #41 of This Week in Privacy is live in 30 minutes, we'll be covering the latest privacy issues and chasing with the community. Come say hi! 👋 youtube.com/live/rvj7aIL...

                                                  Meta's Smart Glasses Just Got ...

                                                    [?]knoppix » 🌐
                                                    @knoppix95@mastodon.social

                                                    ICE triples Azure data usage to 1.4PB (Jul'25-Jan'26), leans on AI Vision/Video Indexer for surveillance amid facial recognition, phone trackers, drones. ☁️

                                                    Reports challenge Microsoft's "no mass surveillance" stance despite contracts; employee concerns rise as policies clash with ICE enforcement reality. ⚖️

                                                    🔗 windowscentral.com/microsoft/m

                                                      Back to top - More...