soc.octade.net is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
social@octade.net

Search results for tag #ai

[?]Timothy R. Butler » 🌐
@trbutler@mastodon.faithtree.social

Yup. is actively surveilling us and remains tangled with a foreign adversary (China). is getting banned by the government for refusing to actively surveil us. That... is disturbing. If you care about and , let your favorite politicians know we actually appreciate tech companies that take anti-surveillance stands. x.com/Scholars_Stage/status/20

    [?]Nonilex » 🌐
    @Nonilex@masto.ai

    The madness continues …

    reaches deal to deploy models on US Department of network

    said Friday OpenAi reached an agreement with the .

    "In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety & a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome," Altman posted on X using the admin’s BS name for the DoD.


    reuters.com/business/openai-re

    Altman post: Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.  In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.  AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.  The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.  We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.  We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.  We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

    Alt...Altman post: Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement. We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

      [?]Nonilex » 🌐
      @Nonilex@masto.ai

      …The ultimate winner could now prove to be Elon ’s [great /s], which ofcls say has already agreed to the ’s terms for working on systems. The entrepreneur jumped on Emil Michael’s social media Friday [the DoD’s technology chief] saying “ hates Western Civilization.” [ridiculous idiot.]

        [?]Nonilex » 🌐
        @Nonilex@masto.ai

        Earlier in the week, Jeff Dean, ’s chief scientist, said he was opposed to the being used for & repeated his long-standing opposition to .

        , ’s chief executive, said Friday that it was important for AI companies to find ways to work with the but that he had concerns similar to those of his rival .

          [?]Nonilex » 🌐
          @Nonilex@masto.ai

          The did not explain the reasoning behind its claim [there is none] that it could compel contractors to immediately cease work with Anthropic.

          …Experts said the admin’s dramatic intervention Friday is likely to have ramifications for more than just the govt’s relationship with , potentially complicating the admin’s work with other developers, especially in relation to work.

            [?]Nonilex » 🌐
            @Nonilex@masto.ai

            …Many researchers & engineers working on have long harbored concerns about their being used to power or . The battle between & the has reawakened those concerns across the industry.

            By Friday afternoon, >550 employees at & maker signed an open letter in support of Anthropic’s position & calling on their bosses to stand up to the Pentagon.


            notdivided.org/

              [?]Nonilex » 🌐
              @Nonilex@masto.ai

              …The designation issued by late Friday was an extraordinary escalation, ranking a leading company alongside the likes of Chinese & Russian firms seen as a danger to the .
              
It was unclear how easy it would be for government departments to move away from ’s , or for the company’s partners that do business with the to cut ties.

                [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                @Nonilex@masto.ai

                The company wrote that, “Designating as a supply chain risk would be an unprecedented action—one historically reserved for US adversaries, never before publicly applied to an American company.” The unsigned blog post added: “We are deeply saddened by these developments.”

                  [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                  @Nonilex@masto.ai

                  said it would fight the blacklisting in court. In a blog post late Friday, the company said that it believed the wide-reaching ban described was not permitted by federal & that the designation of the company as a was “legally unsound.” [pretty good bet]

                    [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                    @Nonilex@masto.ai

                    Late Friday, Secy Pete followed ’s unhinged post, saying in his own post that he was declaring a . “Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic,” Hegseth wrote.

                      [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                      @Nonilex@masto.ai

                      So much for holding back. GMAFB.

                      declares a threat to
                      Secretary Pete declared Anthropic a “,” blocking all federal agencies & contractors from doing business with the company.


                      washingtonpost.com/technology/

                        [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                        @Nonilex@masto.ai

                        The setback comes as leader raced to sell novel to & , particularly for , ahead of its widely expected .

                        At the same time, the battle over had raised concerns that the would follow [certainly not this one] but little other constraint when deploying AI for national-security missions, regardless of or service terms embraced by the technology's developers.

                          screwlisp boosted

                          [?]James Endres Howell » 🌐
                          @jameshowell@fediscience.org

                          Can we all please recognize that this idea, inverted to its opposite, is what is driving the frenzy towards AI?

                          "Management" including battlefield management, "non-lethal" crowd-control management

                          Immigration management, insurance management, medical management, education management

                          Famous IBM slide from 1979: "A COMPUTER CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION"

                          Alt...Famous IBM slide from 1979: "A COMPUTER CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION"

                            [?]Juggling With Eggs » 🌐
                            @JugglingWithEggs@mstdn.social

                            orders all federal agencies to stop using technology over limits dispute.

                            Writing on his social media platform, Trump said that he is ordering all federal agencies stop using Anthropic’s technology, after the company refused to allow the defense department to use it AI product, for mass domestic surveillance or in autonomous weapons systems that can kill people without human input.’

                            Guardian Live

                            Yesterday’s report:

                            theguardian.com/us-news/2026/f

                              [?]Flipboard Culture Desk » 🌐
                              @CultureDesk@flipboard.social

                              If you've requested automated service in Spanish when you call the Washington state Department of Licensing, you get an AI-generated voice speaking English with a Spanish accent. Here's the story from @AssociatedPress, including a recording.

                              flip.it/wsCA4w

                                [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                had sought guarantees that its would not be used for fully or for mass - applications in which the claimed it had no interest [wink wink nudge nudge].

                                  [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                  @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                  Trump's decision stopped short of issued by & the , including that it could invoke the Defense Production Act to require Anthropic's compliance. The Pentagon had also said it considered designating a risk, a step previously only used against businesses tied to foreign adversaries.

                                  But vowed further action if Anthropic did not cooperate with the phaseout.

                                    [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                    @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                    Just like all , really doesn’t like being told no.

                                    Trump says he is directing federal agencies to cease use of in a petty whiny social media post.


                                    reuters.com/world/us/trump-say

                                    Trump post: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military. The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY. Therefore, I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic's technology. We don't need it, we don't want it, and will not do business with them again! There will be a Six Month phase out period for Agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic's products, at various levels. Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow. WE will decide the fate of our Country - NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left Al company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

                                    Alt...Trump post: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military. The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY. Therefore, I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic's technology. We don't need it, we don't want it, and will not do business with them again! There will be a Six Month phase out period for Agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic's products, at various levels. Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow. WE will decide the fate of our Country - NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left Al company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

                                      [?]knoppix » 🌐
                                      @knoppix95@mastodon.social

                                      Anthropic rejects Pentagon’s revised AI deal, saying terms still risk enabling mass surveillance or autonomous weapons. ⚖️

                                      The $200M contract would make Claude the first AI model in classified defense networks—now stalled over ethical limits and state control. 🧭

                                      🔗 edition.cnn.com/2026/02/26/tec

                                        [?]Flipboard News Desk » 🌐
                                        @NewsDesk@flipboard.social

                                        President Trump bars federal agencies from using Anthropic AI technology as the firm refuses to lift safeguards on the military's use of its model, Claude, due to its concerns about the use of AI for mass domestic surveillance and the development of weapons.

                                        . Read more from @Axios@flipboard.com:

                                        flip.it/CK6TQM

                                          [?]The Linux Foundation » 🌐
                                          @linuxfoundation@social.lfx.dev

                                          AI is reshaping careers. As AI moves into production, demand is rising for skills in Linux, cloud native, orchestration, and security.

                                          Join the free webinar “AI Runs on Open Source and Real Humans” on March 11 to explore where AI careers grow and how infra expertise creates real leverage.

                                          Register: linuxfoundation.org/webinars/a

                                            [?]Tinker ☀️ » 🌐
                                            @tinker@infosec.exchange

                                            @alien8 - Yeah, I figure any statement by Duo will absolutely push the whole "its not enabled by default" and its the client's decision to use it.

                                            Which ignores the core point - the employees (once a client enables it) have no say. By even offering this, they put so many people in the position of "accept this or quit" which is not consent.

                                            Especially in the US where one's job is tied to access to healthcare and where many live paycheck to paycheck and if they quit or get fired, they run the real risk of going hungry or losing their house.

                                              [?]Flipboard News Desk » 🌐
                                              @NewsDesk@flipboard.social

                                              Anthropic refuses to bend to Pentagon on AI safeguards as dispute nears deadline.

                                              @AssociatedPress reports: "Anthropic said it sought narrow assurances from the Pentagon that Claude won’t be used for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons." Apparently those assurances did not come.

                                              flip.it/TEKIyW

                                                [?]Tinker ☀️ » 🌐
                                                @tinker@infosec.exchange

                                                Inb4 Duo responds and makes the statement:

                                                "These Persona services are opt-in by the client as additional features. We do not integrate them into our core product."

                                                to which the answer to that response is:

                                                "Yeah, the CLIENT opts in, meaning the COMPANY opts in... the employees have no say. The *employees*, all of us, can only opt out by being fired."

                                                (Edit to revert to original post)

                                                  [?]RonSupportsYou » 🌐
                                                  @RonSupportsYou@mastodon.social

                                                  "Anthropic Chief Executive Dario Amodei publicly rejected the Pentagon’s demand that his company allow unrestricted military use of its artificial intelligence system, saying some applications of AI could 'undermine, rather than defend, democratic values.' Amodei (opposed the use of AI for) two uses: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons" saying “Mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values”:
                                                  sfchronicle.com/tech/article/a

                                                    [?]Tinker ☀️ » 🌐
                                                    @tinker@infosec.exchange

                                                    So Duo (the multifactor authentication service that loves) has integrated with Persona (the privacy destroying, Peter Thiel backed, AI-linked, facial scanning and mapping "identity verification" software)

                                                    You know the recent Discord snafu that received such massive pushback and caused so many people to leave Discord that they've dropped their identity verification?

                                                    Yeah, that Persona.

                                                    Duo integrates it into Duo Premier, Duo Advantage, and even Duo Essentials...

                                                    ...which means many working class folks will have no option but to be enrolled into and use Persona...

                                                    ...or be fired.

                                                    duo.com/docs/identity-verifica

                                                    Identity Verification Last updated: January 23rd, 2026 Overview  To help protect organizations from the ever-growing threat of social engineering attacks, Duo integrates with Persona to offer integrated identity verification (IDV) workflows which provide high-assurance of user identities before allowing critical workforce user lifecycle actions in your organization.  Identity verification is part of the Duo Premier, Duo Advantage, and Duo Essentials plans.

                                                    Alt...Identity Verification Last updated: January 23rd, 2026 Overview To help protect organizations from the ever-growing threat of social engineering attacks, Duo integrates with Persona to offer integrated identity verification (IDV) workflows which provide high-assurance of user identities before allowing critical workforce user lifecycle actions in your organization. Identity verification is part of the Duo Premier, Duo Advantage, and Duo Essentials plans.

                                                      [?]Emeritus Prof Christopher May » 🌐
                                                      @ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us

                                                      This week I've been mainly reading, 284.

                                                      Marge Piercy's SciFi tale Body of Glass (1992) makes an explicit parallel between Jewish tales/myths of the Golum & the construction of a sentient android. Self-avowedly feminist SciFi this is an intriguing take of cyber & real space after global calamity & the triumph of a cadre of multinational corporations. It touches on many themes around AI that seem, over thirty years after it was written, highly prescient! A VG read!

                                                      @books

                                                        [?]Nicola Fabiano » 🌐
                                                        @nicfab@fosstodon.org

                                                        Daily Digest | 27 February 2026

                                                        Your daily dose of Privacy, Data Protection, AI & Cybersecurity news.

                                                        5 stories you should not miss.

                                                        Read more: nicfab.eu/daily-digest/

                                                          [?]Miguel Afonso Caetano » 🌐
                                                          @remixtures@tldr.nettime.org

                                                          "ESET researchers uncovered the first known case of Android malware abusing generative AI for context-aware user interface manipulation. While machine learning has been used to similar ends already – just recently, researchers at Dr.WEB found Android.Phantom, which uses TensorFlow machine learning models to analyze advertisement screenshots and automatically click on detected elements for large scale ad fraud – this is the first time we have seen generative AI deployed in this manner. Because the attackers rely on prompting an AI model (in this instance, Google’s Gemini) to guide malicious UI manipulation, we have named this family PromptSpy. This is the second AI powered malware we have discovered – following PromptLock in August 2025, the first known case of AI-driven ransomware.

                                                          While generative AI is deployed only in a relatively minor part of PromptSpy's code – that responsible for achieving persistence – it still has a significant impact on the malware's adaptability. Specifically, Gemini is used to analyze the current screen and provide PromptSpy with step-by-step instructions on how to ensure the malicious app remains pinned in the recent apps list, thus preventing it from being easily swiped away or killed by the system. The AI model and prompt are predefined in the code and cannot be changed. Since Android malware often relies on UI navigation, leveraging generative AI enables the threat actors to adapt to more or less any device, layout, or OS version, which can greatly expand the pool of potential victims.

                                                          The main purpose of PromptSpy is to deploy a built-in VNC module, giving operators remote access to the victim’s device. This Android malware also abuses the Accessibility Service to block uninstallation with invisible overlays, captures lockscreen data, records video. It communicates with its C&C server via the VNC protocol, using AES encryption."

                                                          welivesecurity.com/en/eset-res

                                                            [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                                            @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                                            Amodei said understands that the , “not private companies, makes decisions.” But “in a narrow set of cases, we believe can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values.” In the case of mass & are “outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely & reliably do.”

                                                              [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                                              @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                                              said in a statement that the ’s new language was framed as a compromise but “was paired with legalese that would allow those safeguards to be disregarded at will.” [shocker]

                                                              In a lengthy blog post Thursday, Amodei wrote: “I believe deeply in the existential importance of using to defend the & other democracies, & to defeat our autocratic adversaries.”

                                                                [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                                                @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                                                Secretary told CEO Dario Amodei on Tuesday that if Anthropic does not allow its model to be used “for all lawful purposes” [as if that’s what they plan to use it for], the would cancel Anthropic’s $200 million contract. In addition to the cancellation, Anthropic would be deemed a “supply chain risk,” a classification normally reserved for companies connected to foreign adversaries, said.

                                                                  [?]Nonilex » 🌐
                                                                  @Nonilex@masto.ai

                                                                  is rejecting the Pentagon’s latest offer to change their contract, saying the changes do not satisfy the company’s concerns that could be used for mass or in fully .

                                                                  The & Anthropic are at odds over restrictions the company places on the use of , the first system to be used in the network.


                                                                  cnn.com/2026/02/26/tech/anthro

                                                                    [?]Longreads » 🌐
                                                                    @longreads@mastodon.world

                                                                    "Imagine a border agent who has just opened a box of shark-like fins or a shipment of live parrots and needs to know whether the particular species is one that can legally be captured and transported."

                                                                    Matthew Ponsford for MIT Technology Review: technologyreview.com/2026/02/2

                                                                      [?]Flipboard Tech Desk » 🌐
                                                                      @TechDesk@flipboard.social

                                                                      Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has rejected the Pentagon's "final offer" in negotiations over allowing the Department of War to use the Claude model as it sees fit. "The contract language we received overnight from the Department of War made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons," Anthropic said in a statement. Here's more from @AxiosNews.

                                                                      flip.it/rhrTxb

                                                                        [?]Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬 » 🌐
                                                                        @BenjaminHCCarr@hachyderm.io

                                                                        Companies Shouldn’t Be Bullied Into Doing
                                                                        ()has reportedly threatened to label Anthropic a “supply chain risk,” in retribution for not lifting restrictions on how their technology is used.
                                                                        should stick by their principles and refuse to allow their to be used in the two ways they have publicly stated they would not support: autonomous weapons systems and surveillance. -
                                                                        eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02/tech

                                                                          [?]Flipboard Tech Desk » 🌐
                                                                          @TechDesk@flipboard.social

                                                                          Google has launched the latest version of Nano Banana 2, the image generation model that promises to more quickly create more realistic images than its predecessors. Read more from @Techcrunch:

                                                                          flip.it/8R8WrS

                                                                            [?]Philosophics » 🌐
                                                                            @microglyphics@mastodon.social

                                                                            I ask Claude how Michel Foucault might consider the parable of the 2 valleys.

                                                                            👉 philosophics.blog/2026/02/26/c

                                                                            I also realise that I lose at least an hour a day just managing my blog posts and social media, as I'd regained that time recently due to spotty internet connectivity owing to a snowstorm in New England.

                                                                              [?]Longreads » 🌐
                                                                              @longreads@mastodon.world

                                                                              "Why do these artificial companions lead us down such dangerous paths? One AI scholar recently argued that what happens when a human and a chatbot engage in conversation should be understood as co-hallucination." —Kristen French for Nautilus

                                                                              nautil.us/why-youre-more-likel ?src=longreads

                                                                                [?]John M. Gamble » 🌐
                                                                                @jgamble@fosstodon.org

                                                                                Ohhh, *that's* what the "Kent" comments were about.

                                                                                Edit: s/Kevin/Kent/ a mistake I keep making.

                                                                                theregister.com/2026/02/25/bca

                                                                                  [?]JuneSim63 💚 » 🌐
                                                                                  @junesim63@mstdn.social

                                                                                  Police arrested a man for a burglary in a city he had never visited after face scanning software deployed across the UK confused him with another person of south Asian heritage.

                                                                                  Facial recognition error prompts police to arrest Asian man for burglary 100 miles away | Facial recognition | The Guardian
                                                                                  theguardian.com/technology/202

                                                                                    Back to top - More...